<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Is WiFi safe for your health, children and at home?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thewindowsclub.com/is-wifi-safe-for-your-health/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/is-wifi-safe-for-your-health</link>
	<description>TheWindowsClub covers authentic Windows 11, Windows 10 tips, tutorials, how-to&#039;s, features, freeware. Created by Anand Khanse, MVP.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:34:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Marek		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/is-wifi-safe-for-your-health#comment-59473</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 02:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=86994#comment-59473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is the WiFi Hotspot that you can set up on the mobile phone equally harmful to health as the proper WiFi from a router?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the WiFi Hotspot that you can set up on the mobile phone equally harmful to health as the proper WiFi from a router?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: runningshoes66		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/is-wifi-safe-for-your-health#comment-56593</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[runningshoes66]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=86994#comment-56593</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thewindowsclub.com/is-wifi-safe-for-your-health#comment-44275&quot;&gt;Fastbikkel&lt;/a&gt;.

You have to find a way to block it, not disable it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thewindowsclub.com/is-wifi-safe-for-your-health#comment-44275">Fastbikkel</a>.</p>
<p>You have to find a way to block it, not disable it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/is-wifi-safe-for-your-health#comment-55535</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=86994#comment-55535</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thewindowsclub.com/is-wifi-safe-for-your-health#comment-39549&quot;&gt;smeezekitty&lt;/a&gt;.

Whether it&#039;s faster or more reliable depends on the setup. &quot;More secure&quot; is nonsense for WPA2 Enterprise networks, especially as LAN usually replaces WLAN authentication completely. LAN is certainly not &quot;unjammable&quot; and, trust me, most schools and businesses don&#039;t need the lowest possible latencies to every computer because most people in these organizations will be working, not playing real-time multiplayer games where every millisecond matters, especially if this slightly lower latency comes at the cost of convenience and having to install LAN ports in every imaginable location.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thewindowsclub.com/is-wifi-safe-for-your-health#comment-39549">smeezekitty</a>.</p>
<p>Whether it&#8217;s faster or more reliable depends on the setup. &#8220;More secure&#8221; is nonsense for WPA2 Enterprise networks, especially as LAN usually replaces WLAN authentication completely. LAN is certainly not &#8220;unjammable&#8221; and, trust me, most schools and businesses don&#8217;t need the lowest possible latencies to every computer because most people in these organizations will be working, not playing real-time multiplayer games where every millisecond matters, especially if this slightly lower latency comes at the cost of convenience and having to install LAN ports in every imaginable location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/is-wifi-safe-for-your-health#comment-55534</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=86994#comment-55534</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thewindowsclub.com/is-wifi-safe-for-your-health#comment-44275&quot;&gt;Fastbikkel&lt;/a&gt;.

That&#039;s ridiculous.
There are plenty of laws controlling Wi-Fi and the
 allowed frequency ranges and bandwidths. All of these ensure that only 
Wi-Fi devices that don&#039;t pose a risk to humans and animals are produced 
and used. By trying to &quot;hack&quot; your neighbors&#039; Wi-Fi routers or interfere
 with their ability to use their network, you are committing a criminal 
offense.
You said you wanted to keep radiation a matter of choice, 
but is that really what you want? No television, radio, GPS or anything 
else that allows the modern world to function the way it does, simply 
because you are scared of the ridiculously low amounts of radiation that
 have not a single time been proven to have even the slightest effect on
 human health? Have you ever considered police radio, life-critical 
systems, flash flood and tornado warning systems? Have you ever 
considered  how many lives these systems save each day? And you want to 
ban them because some of these waves in the air traverse your property?
Would you also 
ban sound waves? Sure, loud, high-amplitude sounds can be disruptive, 
just like Wi-Fi signals with high amplitudes; but unlike with sounds and
 thanks to our extremely stringent regulations, you won&#039;t be able to 
find these signals anywhere remotely close to your house. Maybe it has 
occurred to you that light is also electromagnetic radiation. How long 
should your neighbors go to prison for if they leave on their lights at 
night, and the light disturbs your sleep? Every sane person would close 
their blinds; would you ban your neighbors from using light?
I won&#039;t even start talking about natural background radiation; radiation from air, cosmic and terrestrial radiation and the earth&#039;s magnetic field. Maybe you&#039;re only worried when radiation is produced by humans, but, whether natural or not, radiation is not always inherently harmful. Trying to keep all forms of radiation, harmful or not, off your property is completely ridiculous and only demonstrates how out of touch with reality you are.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thewindowsclub.com/is-wifi-safe-for-your-health#comment-44275">Fastbikkel</a>.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s ridiculous.<br />
There are plenty of laws controlling Wi-Fi and the<br />
 allowed frequency ranges and bandwidths. All of these ensure that only<br />
Wi-Fi devices that don&#8217;t pose a risk to humans and animals are produced<br />
and used. By trying to &#8220;hack&#8221; your neighbors&#8217; Wi-Fi routers or interfere<br />
 with their ability to use their network, you are committing a criminal<br />
offense.<br />
You said you wanted to keep radiation a matter of choice,<br />
but is that really what you want? No television, radio, GPS or anything<br />
else that allows the modern world to function the way it does, simply<br />
because you are scared of the ridiculously low amounts of radiation that<br />
 have not a single time been proven to have even the slightest effect on<br />
 human health? Have you ever considered police radio, life-critical<br />
systems, flash flood and tornado warning systems? Have you ever<br />
considered  how many lives these systems save each day? And you want to<br />
ban them because some of these waves in the air traverse your property?<br />
Would you also<br />
ban sound waves? Sure, loud, high-amplitude sounds can be disruptive,<br />
just like Wi-Fi signals with high amplitudes; but unlike with sounds and<br />
 thanks to our extremely stringent regulations, you won&#8217;t be able to<br />
find these signals anywhere remotely close to your house. Maybe it has<br />
occurred to you that light is also electromagnetic radiation. How long<br />
should your neighbors go to prison for if they leave on their lights at<br />
night, and the light disturbs your sleep? Every sane person would close<br />
their blinds; would you ban your neighbors from using light?<br />
I won&#8217;t even start talking about natural background radiation; radiation from air, cosmic and terrestrial radiation and the earth&#8217;s magnetic field. Maybe you&#8217;re only worried when radiation is produced by humans, but, whether natural or not, radiation is not always inherently harmful. Trying to keep all forms of radiation, harmful or not, off your property is completely ridiculous and only demonstrates how out of touch with reality you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fastbikkel		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/is-wifi-safe-for-your-health#comment-49496</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fastbikkel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=86994#comment-49496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thewindowsclub.com/is-wifi-safe-for-your-health#comment-49493&quot;&gt;AzKat&lt;/a&gt;.

;-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thewindowsclub.com/is-wifi-safe-for-your-health#comment-49493">AzKat</a>.</p>
<p>;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
