<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: FileOptimizer: Free File Manager and Optimizer software for Windows	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thewindowsclub.com/file-optimizer-review-download/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/file-optimizer-review-download</link>
	<description>TheWindowsClub covers authentic Windows 11, Windows 10 tips, tutorials, how-to&#039;s, features, freeware. Created by Anand Khanse, MVP.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 04:23:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Manish Kumar Singh		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/file-optimizer-review-download#comment-30496</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manish Kumar Singh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=75379#comment-30496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thewindowsclub.com/file-optimizer-review-download#comment-30493&quot;&gt;tplarkin7&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for clarifying that!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thewindowsclub.com/file-optimizer-review-download#comment-30493">tplarkin7</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for clarifying that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tplarkin7		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/file-optimizer-review-download#comment-30493</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tplarkin7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=75379#comment-30493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thewindowsclub.com/file-optimizer-review-download#comment-29726&quot;&gt;Hunky&lt;/a&gt;.

There is &quot;lossless&quot; compression. That means every pixel is maintained in it&#039;s original state, but the data is organized in a way that allows some form of compression. You&#039;re wrong about your camera. It depends on your setting. If you want the best quality photo, leave the file size to max on your camera, then use this file compression tool if you need them to be smaller.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thewindowsclub.com/file-optimizer-review-download#comment-29726">Hunky</a>.</p>
<p>There is &#8220;lossless&#8221; compression. That means every pixel is maintained in it&#8217;s original state, but the data is organized in a way that allows some form of compression. You&#8217;re wrong about your camera. It depends on your setting. If you want the best quality photo, leave the file size to max on your camera, then use this file compression tool if you need them to be smaller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hunky		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/file-optimizer-review-download#comment-29726</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hunky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2013 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=75379#comment-29726</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How to &quot;trust&quot; that there would be no quality loss ??


As far as I know, every software or hardware company tries their level best to make sure their output is as low as possible in resource usage and as low as possible in their output foot print.


So as far as I can see, the camera which took the picture, already gave me the best possible size without losing the quality :P]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to &#8220;trust&#8221; that there would be no quality loss ??</p>
<p>As far as I know, every software or hardware company tries their level best to make sure their output is as low as possible in resource usage and as low as possible in their output foot print.</p>
<p>So as far as I can see, the camera which took the picture, already gave me the best possible size without losing the quality :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
