<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Encrypting File System (EFS) on Windows 11/10 explained	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thewindowsclub.com/encrypting-file-system-efs-windows-10/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/encrypting-file-system-efs-windows-10</link>
	<description>TheWindowsClub covers authentic Windows 11, Windows 10 tips, tutorials, how-to&#039;s, features, freeware. Created by Anand Khanse, MVP.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 15:43:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: SkeeterVT		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/encrypting-file-system-efs-windows-10#comment-65097</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SkeeterVT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 12:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=157754#comment-65097</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thewindowsclub.com/encrypting-file-system-efs-windows-10#comment-64976&quot;&gt;ReadandShare&lt;/a&gt;.

I have Windows 10 Professional (64-bit version) on my laptop, so would I be correct in concluding that Windows BitLocker is already loaded in my machine? I also have BitDefender (Part of IObit&#039;s Malware Fighter) installed on my laptop. What differences (if any) are there between BitLocker and BitDefender?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thewindowsclub.com/encrypting-file-system-efs-windows-10#comment-64976">ReadandShare</a>.</p>
<p>I have Windows 10 Professional (64-bit version) on my laptop, so would I be correct in concluding that Windows BitLocker is already loaded in my machine? I also have BitDefender (Part of IObit&#8217;s Malware Fighter) installed on my laptop. What differences (if any) are there between BitLocker and BitDefender?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ayush Vij		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/encrypting-file-system-efs-windows-10#comment-64981</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ayush Vij]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 04:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=157754#comment-64981</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thewindowsclub.com/encrypting-file-system-efs-windows-10#comment-64976&quot;&gt;ReadandShare&lt;/a&gt;.

Sorry, I missed that. Thanks for pointing it out. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thewindowsclub.com/encrypting-file-system-efs-windows-10#comment-64976">ReadandShare</a>.</p>
<p>Sorry, I missed that. Thanks for pointing it out. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ReadandShare		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/encrypting-file-system-efs-windows-10#comment-64976</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ReadandShare]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=157754#comment-64976</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You should start with which Windows versions have EFS / 
Bitlockers - and which versions don&#039;t.  I would say most readers are Windows Home version users - and Bitlocker is NOT available to them at all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should start with which Windows versions have EFS /<br />
Bitlockers &#8211; and which versions don&#8217;t.  I would say most readers are Windows Home version users &#8211; and Bitlocker is NOT available to them at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
