<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How to block websites in Chrome, Firefox on Windows 11/10	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thewindowsclub.com/blacklist-block-websites-browsers-windows/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/blacklist-block-websites-browsers-windows</link>
	<description>TheWindowsClub covers authentic Windows 11, Windows 10 tips, tutorials, how-to&#039;s, features, freeware. Created by Anand Khanse, MVP.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:24:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Raghuveer Singh Rajput		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/blacklist-block-websites-browsers-windows#comment-55558</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raghuveer Singh Rajput]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=100237#comment-55558</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thewindowsclub.com/blacklist-block-websites-browsers-windows#comment-55435&quot;&gt;Juan Figueroa&lt;/a&gt;.

can we block all sites except two URL.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thewindowsclub.com/blacklist-block-websites-browsers-windows#comment-55435">Juan Figueroa</a>.</p>
<p>can we block all sites except two URL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Raghuveer Singh Rajput		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/blacklist-block-websites-browsers-windows#comment-55557</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raghuveer Singh Rajput]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=100237#comment-55557</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi can we block all url except two sites]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi can we block all url except two sites</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Juan Figueroa		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/blacklist-block-websites-browsers-windows#comment-55435</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juan Figueroa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=100237#comment-55435</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How to block urls without http?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to block urls without http?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: &#124;:}		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/blacklist-block-websites-browsers-windows#comment-53359</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#124;:}]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 05:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=100237#comment-53359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have a different rationale for wanting to block (AND NOT JUST MERELY BLOCK!) a website!... i.e., when a website den(ys) my access to its content by stealing my IP address, and then using this to BLACKLIST me! Then!... I want to be able to BLACKLIST such a site, from ITS USE of the Net!... AND NOT JUST FROM &quot;MY&quot; PC! And if &quot;I&quot; shouldn&#039;t be allowed to use such a measure/ technoma, then I DEMAND that such a measure be invoked by a group M-A-N-D-A-T-E-D to do so!... AND THAT THE ICON FOR SUCH A GROUP, BE AFFIXED ON MY-- AND EVERYONE ELSE&#039;S!-- RESPECTIVE PC&#039;S TASKBAR!

-----

The technoma, and practice, discussed at Goog result, IP address blocking - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia... poses a fundamental threat to a user&#039;s Right to Access a given site!... to RESPONSIBLE AND CONSCIONABLE FREE EXPRESSION on a given site (HOWEVER POLITICALLY, AND/ OR SOCIALLY &quot;PROBLEMATIC&quot;!)!... and, thereby, to a user&#039;s Digital and Human Rights! 

-----

NO WEBSITE OWNER... NOR TECHNOMA IN THE CONTROL OF A SITE OWNER!... SHOULD BE  ABLE TO CAPTURE AN IP ADDRESS OF A USER!... LET ALONE, TO USE SAME, TO BLOCK A USER FROM ACCESSING ONE&#039;S SITE! AND USERS SHOULD BE MADE I-M-M-E-D-I-A-T-E-L-Y A-W-A-R-E OF WHO AND/ OR WHAT HAS MADE OFF WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE IP ADDRESS, THROUGH AN A-U-T-H-O-R-I-Z-E-D (I.E., A M-A-N-D-A-T-E-D!) T-R-A-N-S-P-A-R-E-N-T, R-E-A-L T-I-M-E, R-E-M-O-T-E, S-E-C-U-R-I-T-Y I-N-T-E-R-M-E-D-I-A-R-Y SITE INTERFACE TECHNOMA! AND!... AFTERUPON A USER&#039;S CONFIRMATION OF WHO, AND/ OR WHAT HAS ABSCONDED WITH ONE&#039;S IP ADDRESS, SUCH A NETIZEN SHOULD BE AFFORDED AN A-U-T-H-O-R-I-Z-E-D (I.E., A M-A-N-D-A-T-E-D!) T-R-A-N-S-P-A-R-E-N-T, R-E-A-L T-I-M-E, R-E-M-O-T-E, S-E-C-U-R-I-T-Y I-N-T-E-R-M-E-D-I-A-R-Y TECHNOMA/ MECHANISM, TO INTERVENE IN THE MITIGATION/ END OF A-N-Y A-N-D A-L-L R-E-A-L AND I-M-M-I-N-E-N-T THREATS TO A USER&#039;S RESPECTIVE SITE ACCESS!... AND, RESULTANTLY, TO A NETIZEN&#039;S DIGITAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS! FOR!... TO LEAVE THE INTERVENTION RE A SITE OWNER&#039;S BREACHES IN THE HANDS OF RESPECTIVE NETIZENS WHO ARE POTENTIALLY ILL-EQUIPPED TO TACKLE THE TECHNOMA WITH WHICH USERS MAY BE CONFRONTED, IS TO--BY DEFAULT!-- ENABLE THOSE MORE EQUIPPED, AND SKILLED, TO UNDERMINE THE WEBSITE ACCESS OF NETIZENS!... AND, THEIR RESPECTIVE DIGITAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS! FOR!... SOME OF THE BREACHES AGAINST USERS CURRENTLY IN PLAY, ARE BY WAY OF &quot;PROFESSIONAL&quot; NET P-L-A-Y-E-R-S!

-----

However!... if a holder of an IP address poses an I-L-L-E-G-A-L software/ hardware threat to a site, then the most appropriate security measure for a website owner, is to invoke an A-U-T-H-O-R-I-Z-E-D (I.E., A M-A-N-D-A-T-E-D!) T-R-A-N-S-P-A-R-E-N-T, R-E-A-L T-I-M-E, R-E-M-O-T-E, S-E-C-U-R-I-T-Y I-N-T-E-R-M-E-D-I-A-R-Y, AND MECHANISM, TO INTERVENE IN THE MITIGATION/ CESSATION OF A-N-Y A-N-D A-L-L R-E-A-L AND I-M-M-I-N-E-N-T THREATS TO ONE&#039;S RESPECTIVE USER- ACCESSED SITE!... AND, TO ONE&#039;S DIGITAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS! AND OWNERS SHOULD BE MADE I-M-M-E-D-I-A-T-E-L-Y A-W-A-R-E OF WHO AND/ OR WHAT HAS I-L-L-E-G-A-L-L-Y POSED A SOFTWARE/ HARDWARE THREAT TO ONE&#039;S SITE, THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE REMOTE INTERMEDIARY&#039;S WEBSITE INTERFACE TECHNOMA! FOR!... TO LEAVE THE INTERVENTION RE USER-BASED BREACHES IN THE HANDS OF RESPECTIVE SITE OWNERS, RATHER THAN AN A-U-T-H-O-R-I-Z-E-D I-N-T-E-R-M-E-D-I-A-R-Y, IS TO INVITE THE POTENTIAL ARBITRARY DENIAL OF WEBSITE ACCESS TO USERS!... AND, THEREBY, TO POTENTIAL VIOLATIONS OF THE DIGITAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF WEBSITE USERS! 

-----

AND THUS!... AND TO CLOSE!... EVERY S.O.T.A. SECURITY MEASURE AVAILABLE MUST BE INVOKED, THAT WOULD PREVENT A USER&#039;S IP ADDRESS FROM BEING STOLEN!... AND IN ORDER TO UPHOLD A USER&#039;S FREE ACCESS TO PUBLIC SITES, AND TO PROTECT THE DIGITAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS AFFORDED NETIZENS! AND!... CONVERSELY!... EVERY SOTA SECURITY MEASURE AVAILABLE MUST BE INVOKED, THAT WOULD PROTECT AN OWNER&#039;S SITE FROM A USER&#039;S I-L-L-E-G-A-L R-E-A-L AND I-M-M-I-N-E-N-T THREATS TO OWNERS&#039; SITE OPERATIONS! AND!... IF THERE IS TO BE A-N-Y A-U-T-H-O-R-I-Z-E-D (I.E., M-A-N-D-A-T-E-D!) T-R-A-N-S-P-A-R-E-N-T, R-E-A-L T-I-M-E WEBSITE OWNER CONTROLLED, AND SITE-USER CONTROLLED O-F-F-T-H-E-S-H-E-L-F, S-T-A-N-D-A-L-O-N-E TECHNOMAE/ MECHANISMS TO INTERVENE IN THE MITIGATION/ END OF R-E-A-L AND I-M-M-I-N-E-N-T THREATS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE PROVERBIAL FENCE, THEN LET BOTH OWNERS AND USERS BE U-T-T-E-R-L-Y A-W-A-R-E OF THEIR RESPECTIVE (M-A-N-D-A-T-E-D) M-U-T-U-A-L O-B-L-I-G-A-T-I-O-N TO IMPLEMENT ONLY A-U-T-H-O-R-I-Z-E-D/ M-A-N-D-A-T-E-D  TECHNOMAE/ MECHANISMS!... OR, SUCH SUFFER THE CIVIL AND/ OR CRIMINAL REPERCUSSIONS/ CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR USE OF A-N-Y A-N-D A-L-L U-N-A-U-T-H-O-R-I-Z-E-D TECHNOMAE/ MECHANISMS!... AND!... BY WAY OF THE TASKBAR ICON-- AND AUTHORITY!-- AS AFOREMENTIONED!

-----

Please!... no emails!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a different rationale for wanting to block (AND NOT JUST MERELY BLOCK!) a website!&#8230; i.e., when a website den(ys) my access to its content by stealing my IP address, and then using this to BLACKLIST me! Then!&#8230; I want to be able to BLACKLIST such a site, from ITS USE of the Net!&#8230; AND NOT JUST FROM &#8220;MY&#8221; PC! And if &#8220;I&#8221; shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to use such a measure/ technoma, then I DEMAND that such a measure be invoked by a group M-A-N-D-A-T-E-D to do so!&#8230; AND THAT THE ICON FOR SUCH A GROUP, BE AFFIXED ON MY&#8211; AND EVERYONE ELSE&#8217;S!&#8211; RESPECTIVE PC&#8217;S TASKBAR!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>The technoma, and practice, discussed at Goog result, IP address blocking &#8211; Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia&#8230; poses a fundamental threat to a user&#8217;s Right to Access a given site!&#8230; to RESPONSIBLE AND CONSCIONABLE FREE EXPRESSION on a given site (HOWEVER POLITICALLY, AND/ OR SOCIALLY &#8220;PROBLEMATIC&#8221;!)!&#8230; and, thereby, to a user&#8217;s Digital and Human Rights! </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>NO WEBSITE OWNER&#8230; NOR TECHNOMA IN THE CONTROL OF A SITE OWNER!&#8230; SHOULD BE  ABLE TO CAPTURE AN IP ADDRESS OF A USER!&#8230; LET ALONE, TO USE SAME, TO BLOCK A USER FROM ACCESSING ONE&#8217;S SITE! AND USERS SHOULD BE MADE I-M-M-E-D-I-A-T-E-L-Y A-W-A-R-E OF WHO AND/ OR WHAT HAS MADE OFF WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE IP ADDRESS, THROUGH AN A-U-T-H-O-R-I-Z-E-D (I.E., A M-A-N-D-A-T-E-D!) T-R-A-N-S-P-A-R-E-N-T, R-E-A-L T-I-M-E, R-E-M-O-T-E, S-E-C-U-R-I-T-Y I-N-T-E-R-M-E-D-I-A-R-Y SITE INTERFACE TECHNOMA! AND!&#8230; AFTERUPON A USER&#8217;S CONFIRMATION OF WHO, AND/ OR WHAT HAS ABSCONDED WITH ONE&#8217;S IP ADDRESS, SUCH A NETIZEN SHOULD BE AFFORDED AN A-U-T-H-O-R-I-Z-E-D (I.E., A M-A-N-D-A-T-E-D!) T-R-A-N-S-P-A-R-E-N-T, R-E-A-L T-I-M-E, R-E-M-O-T-E, S-E-C-U-R-I-T-Y I-N-T-E-R-M-E-D-I-A-R-Y TECHNOMA/ MECHANISM, TO INTERVENE IN THE MITIGATION/ END OF A-N-Y A-N-D A-L-L R-E-A-L AND I-M-M-I-N-E-N-T THREATS TO A USER&#8217;S RESPECTIVE SITE ACCESS!&#8230; AND, RESULTANTLY, TO A NETIZEN&#8217;S DIGITAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS! FOR!&#8230; TO LEAVE THE INTERVENTION RE A SITE OWNER&#8217;S BREACHES IN THE HANDS OF RESPECTIVE NETIZENS WHO ARE POTENTIALLY ILL-EQUIPPED TO TACKLE THE TECHNOMA WITH WHICH USERS MAY BE CONFRONTED, IS TO&#8211;BY DEFAULT!&#8211; ENABLE THOSE MORE EQUIPPED, AND SKILLED, TO UNDERMINE THE WEBSITE ACCESS OF NETIZENS!&#8230; AND, THEIR RESPECTIVE DIGITAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS! FOR!&#8230; SOME OF THE BREACHES AGAINST USERS CURRENTLY IN PLAY, ARE BY WAY OF &#8220;PROFESSIONAL&#8221; NET P-L-A-Y-E-R-S!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>However!&#8230; if a holder of an IP address poses an I-L-L-E-G-A-L software/ hardware threat to a site, then the most appropriate security measure for a website owner, is to invoke an A-U-T-H-O-R-I-Z-E-D (I.E., A M-A-N-D-A-T-E-D!) T-R-A-N-S-P-A-R-E-N-T, R-E-A-L T-I-M-E, R-E-M-O-T-E, S-E-C-U-R-I-T-Y I-N-T-E-R-M-E-D-I-A-R-Y, AND MECHANISM, TO INTERVENE IN THE MITIGATION/ CESSATION OF A-N-Y A-N-D A-L-L R-E-A-L AND I-M-M-I-N-E-N-T THREATS TO ONE&#8217;S RESPECTIVE USER- ACCESSED SITE!&#8230; AND, TO ONE&#8217;S DIGITAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS! AND OWNERS SHOULD BE MADE I-M-M-E-D-I-A-T-E-L-Y A-W-A-R-E OF WHO AND/ OR WHAT HAS I-L-L-E-G-A-L-L-Y POSED A SOFTWARE/ HARDWARE THREAT TO ONE&#8217;S SITE, THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE REMOTE INTERMEDIARY&#8217;S WEBSITE INTERFACE TECHNOMA! FOR!&#8230; TO LEAVE THE INTERVENTION RE USER-BASED BREACHES IN THE HANDS OF RESPECTIVE SITE OWNERS, RATHER THAN AN A-U-T-H-O-R-I-Z-E-D I-N-T-E-R-M-E-D-I-A-R-Y, IS TO INVITE THE POTENTIAL ARBITRARY DENIAL OF WEBSITE ACCESS TO USERS!&#8230; AND, THEREBY, TO POTENTIAL VIOLATIONS OF THE DIGITAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF WEBSITE USERS! </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>AND THUS!&#8230; AND TO CLOSE!&#8230; EVERY S.O.T.A. SECURITY MEASURE AVAILABLE MUST BE INVOKED, THAT WOULD PREVENT A USER&#8217;S IP ADDRESS FROM BEING STOLEN!&#8230; AND IN ORDER TO UPHOLD A USER&#8217;S FREE ACCESS TO PUBLIC SITES, AND TO PROTECT THE DIGITAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS AFFORDED NETIZENS! AND!&#8230; CONVERSELY!&#8230; EVERY SOTA SECURITY MEASURE AVAILABLE MUST BE INVOKED, THAT WOULD PROTECT AN OWNER&#8217;S SITE FROM A USER&#8217;S I-L-L-E-G-A-L R-E-A-L AND I-M-M-I-N-E-N-T THREATS TO OWNERS&#8217; SITE OPERATIONS! AND!&#8230; IF THERE IS TO BE A-N-Y A-U-T-H-O-R-I-Z-E-D (I.E., M-A-N-D-A-T-E-D!) T-R-A-N-S-P-A-R-E-N-T, R-E-A-L T-I-M-E WEBSITE OWNER CONTROLLED, AND SITE-USER CONTROLLED O-F-F-T-H-E-S-H-E-L-F, S-T-A-N-D-A-L-O-N-E TECHNOMAE/ MECHANISMS TO INTERVENE IN THE MITIGATION/ END OF R-E-A-L AND I-M-M-I-N-E-N-T THREATS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE PROVERBIAL FENCE, THEN LET BOTH OWNERS AND USERS BE U-T-T-E-R-L-Y A-W-A-R-E OF THEIR RESPECTIVE (M-A-N-D-A-T-E-D) M-U-T-U-A-L O-B-L-I-G-A-T-I-O-N TO IMPLEMENT ONLY A-U-T-H-O-R-I-Z-E-D/ M-A-N-D-A-T-E-D  TECHNOMAE/ MECHANISMS!&#8230; OR, SUCH SUFFER THE CIVIL AND/ OR CRIMINAL REPERCUSSIONS/ CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR USE OF A-N-Y A-N-D A-L-L U-N-A-U-T-H-O-R-I-Z-E-D TECHNOMAE/ MECHANISMS!&#8230; AND!&#8230; BY WAY OF THE TASKBAR ICON&#8211; AND AUTHORITY!&#8211; AS AFOREMENTIONED!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Please!&#8230; no emails!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Rentzel		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/blacklist-block-websites-browsers-windows#comment-52326</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Rentzel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 07:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=100237#comment-52326</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[After some extensive research, it appears that some programs can be blocked and some go through at will. I have tried host, windows firewall, and a 3rd party hosts editing program. None worked on the site I wanted blocked. It really pisses me off that I can&#039;t have an option to have all applications ask me for permission to access the internet. Windows is a curse on us all!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After some extensive research, it appears that some programs can be blocked and some go through at will. I have tried host, windows firewall, and a 3rd party hosts editing program. None worked on the site I wanted blocked. It really pisses me off that I can&#8217;t have an option to have all applications ask me for permission to access the internet. Windows is a curse on us all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
