<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Anti-WebMiner for Windows will stop Cryptojacking Mining Scripts	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thewindowsclub.com/anti-webminer-stop-cryptojacking-mining-scripts/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/anti-webminer-stop-cryptojacking-mining-scripts</link>
	<description>TheWindowsClub covers authentic Windows 11, Windows 10 tips, tutorials, how-to&#039;s, features, freeware. Created by Anand Khanse, MVP.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 04:10:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Salsa Brava		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/anti-webminer-stop-cryptojacking-mining-scripts#comment-61645</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Salsa Brava]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2017 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=142519#comment-61645</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thewindowsclub.com/anti-webminer-stop-cryptojacking-mining-scripts#comment-61336&quot;&gt;Anand Khanse&lt;/a&gt;.

what is the real advantage of the Adguard DNS over browser&#039;s ad-blockers ?
I have installed this software but I think it&#039;s not useful for me.
I also have tried the DNS numbers 176.103.130.130 but I don&#039;t feel any difference]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thewindowsclub.com/anti-webminer-stop-cryptojacking-mining-scripts#comment-61336">Anand Khanse</a>.</p>
<p>what is the real advantage of the Adguard DNS over browser&#8217;s ad-blockers ?<br />
I have installed this software but I think it&#8217;s not useful for me.<br />
I also have tried the DNS numbers 176.103.130.130 but I don&#8217;t feel any difference</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anand Khanse		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/anti-webminer-stop-cryptojacking-mining-scripts#comment-61336</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anand Khanse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 04:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=142519#comment-61336</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thewindowsclub.com/anti-webminer-stop-cryptojacking-mining-scripts#comment-61334&quot;&gt;Danielx64&lt;/a&gt;.

It should suffice as most antivirus now detect mining scripts like Coinhive&#039;s; but as an added layer adding entries to the Hosts file using AntiWebMiner might be a good idea.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thewindowsclub.com/anti-webminer-stop-cryptojacking-mining-scripts#comment-61334">Danielx64</a>.</p>
<p>It should suffice as most antivirus now detect mining scripts like Coinhive&#8217;s; but as an added layer adding entries to the Hosts file using AntiWebMiner might be a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Danielx64		</title>
		<link>https://www.thewindowsclub.com/anti-webminer-stop-cryptojacking-mining-scripts#comment-61334</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danielx64]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=142519#comment-61334</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does having antivirus installed and using something like Adugard&#039;s DNS solve the issue or not really?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does having antivirus installed and using something like Adugard&#8217;s DNS solve the issue or not really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
