<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox flaws account for 44% of all browser vulnerabilities.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thewindowsclub.com/firefox-flaws-account-for-44-of-all-browser-vulnerabilities/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thewindowsclub.com/firefox-flaws-account-for-44-of-all-browser-vulnerabilities?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=firefox-flaws-account-for-44-of-all-browser-vulnerabilities</link>
	<description>The Windows Club is  created by Anand Khanse, a Microsoft MVP and is primarily targeted at the Windows 7, 8 &#38; Vista user and will address and cover issues in relation to Microsoft and Windows OS.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: viruzth</title>
		<link>http://www.thewindowsclub.com/firefox-flaws-account-for-44-of-all-browser-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1#comment-6674</link>
		<dc:creator>viruzth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=4686#comment-6674</guid>
		<description>What is firefox anyway. I gave up using firefox since 3.00.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is firefox anyway. I gave up using firefox since 3.00.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.thewindowsclub.com/firefox-flaws-account-for-44-of-all-browser-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1#comment-1793</link>
		<dc:creator>Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=4686#comment-1793</guid>
		<description>I work on Firefox, and I&#039;m not surprised.  They have more people working on &quot;new features&quot; than fixing existing problems - even security exploits!

I submitted a security bug last year that wasn&#039;t fixed for 6 months - the exploit could delete all your bookmarks and make Firefox unable to start anymore just by visiting a website - even with flash and javascript turned off.

It really shows in how the browser runs.  They blame every problem on addons because it&#039;s easier than fixing anything.  Instead they put people work integrating addon features that aren&#039;t even popular (&#039;Ubiquity&#039; is a great example - who wants your location bar to work like a DOS prompt?  Nobody huh?)  Then take out features people use and say &quot;this should be in an addon anyway - it&#039;s easy to write, but I&#039;ll let somebody else do it&quot; - yeah, sure, thanks.

They even violate cardinal user interface rules.  For example, a UI is never never never supposed to become unresponsive - but sort a very long list of bookmarks, and bamn, frozen.  Go to a page with intense javascript, bamn.  Or a page with poorly written flash, bamn, crash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work on Firefox, and I&#8217;m not surprised.  They have more people working on &#8220;new features&#8221; than fixing existing problems &#8211; even security exploits!</p>
<p>I submitted a security bug last year that wasn&#8217;t fixed for 6 months &#8211; the exploit could delete all your bookmarks and make Firefox unable to start anymore just by visiting a website &#8211; even with flash and javascript turned off.</p>
<p>It really shows in how the browser runs.  They blame every problem on addons because it&#8217;s easier than fixing anything.  Instead they put people work integrating addon features that aren&#8217;t even popular (&#8216;Ubiquity&#8217; is a great example &#8211; who wants your location bar to work like a DOS prompt?  Nobody huh?)  Then take out features people use and say &#8220;this should be in an addon anyway &#8211; it&#8217;s easy to write, but I&#8217;ll let somebody else do it&#8221; &#8211; yeah, sure, thanks.</p>
<p>They even violate cardinal user interface rules.  For example, a UI is never never never supposed to become unresponsive &#8211; but sort a very long list of bookmarks, and bamn, frozen.  Go to a page with intense javascript, bamn.  Or a page with poorly written flash, bamn, crash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Force</title>
		<link>http://www.thewindowsclub.com/firefox-flaws-account-for-44-of-all-browser-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1#comment-1575</link>
		<dc:creator>Force</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=4686#comment-1575</guid>
		<description>Crap! I wont believe this report. Its not the Firefox Browser. AFAIK Most of the vulnerability is in the extensions not the Browser.

P.S: Am a Microsoft fan, But i use Firefox :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crap! I wont believe this report. Its not the Firefox Browser. AFAIK Most of the vulnerability is in the extensions not the Browser.</p>
<p>P.S: Am a Microsoft fan, But i use Firefox <img src='http://www.thewindowsclub.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beowülf</title>
		<link>http://www.thewindowsclub.com/firefox-flaws-account-for-44-of-all-browser-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1#comment-1570</link>
		<dc:creator>Beowülf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=4686#comment-1570</guid>
		<description>Hmm... Begs the question whether you would really expect a browser by the likes of Firefox to be secure when it is a community project requiring input from various [unknown] individuals, but still with the competitive expertise..?
(btw. I&#039;m a proud user of Firefox 3.5x)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; Begs the question whether you would really expect a browser by the likes of Firefox to be secure when it is a community project requiring input from various [unknown] individuals, but still with the competitive expertise..?<br />
(btw. I&#8217;m a proud user of Firefox 3.5x)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

